White's Boots
-
-
I'd go without the Kilties.. Or you could trim the fronts have a straight edge close to the first eyelets..
-
@riffblaster general, kilties all the way.
-
Without. Definitely a cleaner, less "Hey! Check out my lumberjack boots!" vibe that way.
-
i feel like the kilties make the boot look strangely small. like they throw the proportions off. i can't quite explain it.
i mean on my pair of course…. they actually look awesome on yours den1mhead
-
Without. Definitely a cleaner, less "Hey! Check out my lumberjack boots!" vibe that way.
same thought i had.
-
Also agree on no kilties. I think the fact that your sole isn't lugged makes the boot look less lumberjack-ish. The big thing for me is the contrast between the color and texture of the two leathers. If the kilties were the same leather as the boots I think they would look really good. But regardless those boots look really clean without the kilties.
-
Upon reflection I have worn kilties with my IHVB-03CT but now I wear them without and much prefer the cleaner look.
However, I love my IH kilties with my Whites SJ's -
^^ now that made me laugh, personally I would go without
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Killtie's on lace to toe rock but not on those.
-
If you do go with the false tongues, at least make sure to flip them over to the rough out side so that they match the leather of the boot.
-
Love the evo.. What laces are those?
-
Whites Boots post dying of the toe cap, vamp and counter. Worn a few times now and with a few neutral polishes.
The dye seems to have taken really well to the leather and at this point I couldn't be happier with the results.
-
@riffblaster:
i feel like the kilties make the boot look strangely small.
my thoughts were exactly the the opposite, go kilties!
- but that's my opinion 
)
