Graphic comparisons between IH cuts

[rovdjurstorget]

I wanted to see the difference between some cuts and made a quick graphic comparison between 666, 777, 888 and 634. Using photos from Brund's website (of jeans all in size 33) that are taken from a similar angle and size I placed the photos next to each other and drew lines across 4 points. I also added color coded points across the hem to illustrate the differences in width.

Comparison areas:

**The bottom of the back pocket

The side seam's end

The side pocket rivet

The top of the waist

Additional points in hem opening/cuff width**

Of course this is a rough comparison and the cuffing varies in length, but you still get a good idea of the differences.

I couldn't find a good 555 picture but if someone finds one let me know and I'll add it.

All points stacked:

[Mizmazzle]

This is pretty cool!

[T4920]

This is so well done, kudos to you 

[Jett129]

Thanks for moving it. More people may get to see it this way.

[Daniel San]

awesome
what a great idea ! really amazing !

[motojobobo]

This is an awesome tool!!! @rovdjurstorget deserves a looonnnggg applause from me for this idea and its implementation…

I’ve been considering buying a 777 for quite some time but had some doubts With this chart I can safely conclude that for my motorcycle riding I’m better off with a 666 or a 634 given their higher and more comfortable rear pocket placement. In addition, a 666 is better for me as it has a lower rise than a 634 as I’m used to low-rise jeans. Fantastic tool for me!
I’m sure smarter guys already knew all this but for the laggards like me this tool is a revelation!

[motojobobo]

Also, @rovdjurstorget , thank you for including the 634!!!

[rovdjurstorget]

@motojobobo:

This is an awesome tool!!! @rovdjurstorget deserves a looonnnggg applause from me for this idea and its implementation…

I’ve been considering buying a 777 for quite some time but had some doubts With this chart I can safely conclude that for my motorcycle riding I’m better off with a 666 or a 634 given their higher and more comfortable rear pocket placement. In addition, a 666 is better for me as it has a lower rise than a 634 as I’m used to low-rise jeans. Fantastic tool for me!
I’m sure smarter guys already knew all this but for the laggards like me this tool is a revelation!

Thank you guys, I'm glad this visual aid could help you get a clearer view on the cuts.

I do have to add. Although the 777 is a low rise with low back pockets, it's one of the most comfortable jeans I own. This has more to do with getting the right size for your body type to feel comfortable. I once did the mistake of buying the 666s 21oz one size too small, and it was a too much work to wear as everyday jeans.

Lesson learned: Always buy jeans with a good enough margin, snug but never too tight.

The low pocket thing also works out pretty good with the 777's as I feel the wallet or mobile really end up laying flat, and not halfway pointing out of the pocket.

I still haven't tried 634's but I'm tempted, together with 888's, as I'm more into comfort than tight stretchy projects lately.

@motojobobo:

Also, @rovdjurstorget , thank you for including the 634!!!

Thank you for suggesting it! As soon as I find a good 555 photo from the same angle, I'll add it as well.

[Karol]

Thank you for doing this!
I was also looking at the comparison from IH-Japan.

[Karol]

This one is also from IH-Japan

[Anesthetist]

Nice one there ^^

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Karol]

As shown in the new IH Nagoya store where Haraki wants to sell more IH UK designs.