IH-666D - 17oz Duck Slim Straight Cut Jeans - Brown
-
I knew the Ducks would be here today, so I borrowed a co-worker's camera for my first ever fit pics. (Giles, you and Paula should run for office.. you run the tightest ship ever. It is like clockwork. And an absolute pleasure to do 'business' with. Thank you.)
More of what's already been said above… These ducks are a perfect product. Amazing. Perfect. Not too slim, not too loose. Firm, but comfortable. I'm not sure I'm ever going to them 'em off!
Sorry for the shite photos, but it's half a look anyway. For those who are still on the fence, and can pull the trigger.. you will have zero regrets!
I'm 6'2" / 175lbs. Tagged 34. Cuffed twice. We'll see about a hem.. they cuff really nicely.. may just let 'em live..
CB
-
Looks good Bain.
-
They will Alex man you will see as they are less tapered than the 634s and top block is really nice cutted it will give you a nice slim straight look (not superslim) when sized tts and thighs are alright.
You handle the dc4001 very nice, so you can handle the ducksuckers too quack quackLooking forward to your fit mate
-
Buddy Finn, 666s is superslim while 666d is "only" slim cut imho. Dont forget 666s is unsanforised and gets much tighter imho. So therefore yes less than 666s….aaah my english...
And Sorry mate direct comparison with 634 only works for lower sizes..still I think compared to the 634 cut and in its relation to a slim cut 666d are less tapered. But I am not the mathematical expert in this area i also compared with the Top Block area between 634 (roomier) and 666d (skinnier), this is why i think 666d gives a better straight cut from top to bottom. But hei still loving all my 634 variations, got 6 of em
Dont want to confuse get the ducks now hehe
-
They will Alex man you will see as they are less tapered than the 634s and top block is really nice cutted it will give you a nice slim straight look (not superslim) when sized tts and thighs are alright.
You handle the dc4001 very nice, so you can handle the ducksuckers too quack quackLooking forward to your fit mate
hope the 34 is not to tight:-)
waist / leg area