Watches - another OCD problem
-
Date is fine by me but that text belongs somewhere else…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I like the date there, it preserves the lovely lumed digits and is subtle enough not to bother me.
Probably better still without a date, especially on this smaller dial, but if they must include one, I think that's the right way to do it.
It would be nice to offer this smaller size more broadly than they are and replace the anniversary text with the depth rating.
-
The Seventieth Anniversary model is basically a remake of the Fiftieth Anniversary model, down to the text on the dial. You can't see it in this photo, but there's a date window at 4:30.
I found an article about the Fiftieth Anniversary which has more photos. The only real difference with the new one is that it's got a solid back.
-
New member here, good to see a watch thread!!
Some of mine. Big fan of the 6538 Sub so was pleased to see Tudor release an homage. The Hamilton is also such incredible value and one of the ones I wear most often.
And yep, right wrist. If It's good enough for Steve McQueen…
-
@goosehd - Thanks, much appreciated.
The Speedmaster doesn't get much wear due to my dainty wrists. Another reason to love Tudor for making new watches with 'old-school' dimensions.
Coveting that new Explorer style Black Bay Pro they released late last year.
-
I love a good watch thread. Getting into watches can get you into some trouble quickly though! I recently picked up the Pelagos 39 and a Hamilton Khaki Field to add to the ever-growing collection.
-
I love that 39. Had I not bought the FXD this year I would’ve been on the hunt for one.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Not seen the 39 in the flesh. Looks beautiful! Mind you, not seen the FXD in the flesh yet either!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
That pelagos looks great! I've been wearing my Omega PO 2500 but considering getting on the list for a plain Rolex Sub no date now that the market has cooled.
Sent from my SM-S906U1 using Tapatalk
-
Yes, the no date Sub is hard to beat. People love to hate on Rolex, but their feature set is rarely beaten. The Sub is nothing special until you look at the dimensions and quality of the bezel. The Explorer II is similarly unmatched in this case height (GS is getting close). And, no, I don't own any…
-
I love a good watch thread. Getting into watches can get you into some trouble quickly though! I recently picked up the Pelagos 39 and a Hamilton Khaki Field to add to the ever-growing collection
thankfully for my bank balance I’m watch-illiterate, but that Tudor (Pelagos 39?) is very nice indeed.
-
I love a good watch thread. Getting into watches can get you into some trouble quickly though! I recently picked up the Pelagos 39 and a Hamilton Khaki Field to add to the ever-growing collection
thankfully for my bank balance I’m watch-illiterate, but that Tudor (Pelagos 39?) is very nice indeed.
Thanks! It’s titanium so pretty light as well compared to steel.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Seamaster today in the snow
-
Such great watches everyone. My newest obsession is finding a vintage Benrus Type I watch. These are getting more and more difficult to find. The Type II is nice as well but I just love the simplicity of the Type I.
-
@JDelage I keep coming back to your picture of your new GS to admire it and wondering how it’s working for you.
So, it's beautiful but it might not be for me. Here's why:
- I'm 51, and I basically cannot see the pattern on the watch. It's so fine it's hard to see unless in full daylight.
- The manual wound spring drive does nothing for me.
- The deploying buckle on leather is a tad bulky - bulkier than a simple leather strap.
So I'm thinking of selling it. I have several watches I need to sell, and if I can make it work I'll combine several sales into one purchase of something nice and maybe with a tad flashier dial.
-
@JDelage Thank you for the honest and insightful feedback. The texture on the dial looks pronounced from the pictures but it's good to know that in reality it's not. It would save me from making a purchase I would ultimately be unhappy with.
I'm finding that I need my glasses more and more everyday and would be disappointed to know that the main feature I like about your watch is not something that I could enjoy without them.
