1955S - 21oz Selvedge Denim "1955" Straight Cut Jeans - Indigo
-
Thanks
-
@AdamJ said in 1955S - 21oz Selvedge Denim "1955" Straight Cut Jeans - Indigo:
@drewfonse It is in production in the 21oz. We have a sample of the 14oz, that will go in to production in the coming months with a view to be delivered Q2/Q3 next year.
Any plans on OD version of either 21oz or 14oz ?
-
@Alex said in 1955S - 21oz Selvedge Denim "1955" Straight Cut Jeans - Indigo:
@Hohba01 21od in the works...
sounds lovely looking forward to both releases in due time.
-
Coming back to IH after some time away. I miss my IH 777 21oz dearly, but they don't fit anymore after taking up weight lifting a couple years ago....
Is the 1955S cut the most roomy jeans through the thigh (relative to the waist measurement) that IH offers?
-
@FlannelnBooze the 1955 and the 888 are very similar, the 1955 slightly higher in the rise and wider in the leg.
Comparison of the main cuts found here: https://www.ironheart.co.uk/content/cut-comparison
-
@Alex ahh I'd missed that comparison chart. Will the 1955s be added to that chart? Curious how the seat / thigh area compare between them and the 888s.
My local IH stockist doesn't carry 888s or 1955s, but I may have to swing by soon enough to discuss.
777 fit in heavyweight, plz
Wish list:
IHSH-75-IND
IHJ-85-BLK -
@FlannelnBooze said in 1955S - 21oz Selvedge Denim "1955" Straight Cut Jeans - Indigo:
@Alex ahh I'd missed that comparison chart. Will the 1955s be added to that chart? Curious how the seat / thigh area compare between them and the 888s.
My local IH stockist doesn't carry 888s or 1955s, but I may have to swing by soon enough to discuss.
The chart only contains our 'core' cuts, and we don't consider the 1955 one of those, at the moment. If it becomes one, we will
-
@FlannelnBooze you might prefer the 888 over the 1955 anyway, since like the 777 it also has a taper from the knee
-
-
@goosehd thank you
-
You can always run a "compare" which I have done for you here:
https://www.ironheart.co.uk/module/leofeature/productscompare?list=230%2C1478
-
Everyone knows I love the 1955s my favorite cut. I also wear 888s. Measurements are close. I am size 34, I have super long legs and a short torso. IMHO the silhouette is totally different VS the 888s, Especially from the side profile. 1955s is slimmer looking from a side profile. Front profile the 1955s look a little fuller from the hip to the knee, especially mid thigh to knee. It then tapers nicely from knee to the hem. If you got long legs with a short torso this is a great cut.
I feel like the 888s is way more relaxed through seat into the into mid thigh. Mid thigh is kind of where the taper starts continues through the knee to the hem. 888s to me has a slimmer front profile due to the taper starting mid thigh, but 888s I think has a fuller side profile due to a more relaxed seat and crotch area.
I like having both in the closet. Even though they close in measurements their silhouette on the body is different enough to have one of each.
-
@TinMan. So based on your experience with both cuts you think the top block of the 888 is looser than the 1955?
