BS69xSOP420 - 21oz 777 SBG Berkeley Supply x Snake Oil Provisions Collab
-
RESTOCKING FRIDAY 1ST JULY AT 1600BST
-
Thanks @Chesson
-
Would this or the SE 633 cut have more room in the pockets? Thanks!
-
Can I ask what everyone's correct sizing was one these?
I have a couple pairs but now debating to size down to the same size waist as my 555's and 777's.I wear 31's in the 555's (21 oz Fade to Grey) and 777's. (21 oz Indigo)
I bought 32's awhile back for these and debating if I should try 31's. I'm just hoping to make the hip and knee area a little tighter.. other than that my current ones aren't too bad. The waist measurements/ front rise are was makes me hesitant.Curious anyone's thought. Thanks!
-
@Topherfoy First and foremost I would advise measuring your best fitting pair of jeans currently then using that number as a target. The latest version of these is same as all of our other 21oz SBG denim in that it is sanforised and one washed. So you'll get approx 1" stretch in the waist over time, so take this in to account when sizing.
We've just updated the product page with the correct info, apologies for any confusion!
-
I will say that mine felt like they shrunk a ton after a wash. My tag 31 we're actually too big to start so I soaked twice. They were good until I washed them now they feel too small while I don't believe I've changed cuz my other jeans all feel the same
Edit, so now they are not sanforized and unwashed but actually washed … Looking at the new size chart, I'd still take a 31 -
These look great, but are they too similar to my NOLOT?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
@Anesthetist nothing is too close to SBG denim
-
Just copped the last size 34 with a teacore vintage black belt, next indigo invitational contest is going to be fun ^^ ^^ ^^ Didn't know there was another promotion with 15% on belt if bought with a pant, got a double promo here and paid 397 euros for both items, that's a great deal, thanks IH
-
I wanna try those so bad, just scared of the 777 cut that it will not work for me.
-
Copped mine in late July but will wait to break them in until September. I will show the progress here…
-
Has anybody sized one up on those. I have to go to tag 40 to fit my thighs and have a acceptable knee measurement. I just don't want to top block to look sloopy. My normal tag size is 38 on the 888 cut and 36 or 38 on the 634 depending if i want a slim looking profile. Cuts 666 and 555 are no go at all. By the time i get to an acceptable thigh the waist is out of control. What younguys think? Worth a try or wait for a 634 restock
-
Size 33 is my size in all my 777 denims. I never tried a different cut yet.
-
Has anybody sized one up on those. I have to go to tag 40 to fit my thighs and have a acceptable knee measurement. I just don't want to top block to look sloopy. My normal tag size is 38 on the 888 cut and 36 or 38 on the 634 depending if i want a slim looking profile. Cuts 666 and 555 are no go at all. By the time i get to an acceptable thigh the waist is out of control. What younguys think? Worth a try or wait for a 634 restock
I think it is worth a try sizing up on the 777 cut. It's what I have to do to get the thighs to fit and to compensate for the lower rise. I've even sized up two to three sizes before and it still works out. The top block doesn't look sloppy to me because my thighs/glutes will still fill it out some and it's pretty damn comfy honestly having a looser more comfortable fitting waist out of the bag..especially with a low rise. It actually ends up being a very nice, slim straight fitting jean. I know it says they are tapered, which they are, but to me they have more of a slim straight look when sizing up. Some of my best fitting pairs are sized up 777's.
This is just my experience of course.
-
@yannis I should specify that I don't own this particular fabric in the 777 cut. I was referring to the 14oz, 21oz and 21/23oz UHR (old run, not the most recent release) of fabrics of different variations (Indigo, overdyed, black/black) when speaking on my experiences with sizing up.
-
fwiw, a tag size 34 666 with new measurements of 34w, 12.2t, 10.5/15.0 rises is about right for me and recently tried on the tag size 34 of these and they fit how they should. Which is to say they fit as a very low rise, which is somewhat confusing given that the numbers on these indicate that they should sit in a similar place relative to my hips as on the 666's, but they dont on me.
The 666's when stretched to 35/12.5/11/15.5 fit on and just above my hip bones, these 777's feel a mile away lower showing off a lot more of my underwear all the way around the waistband. Otherwise, the top block width feels similar to me and the thigh to knee taper also feels similar'ish to the 666 unlike the NOLOTS where it seemed to taper to the knee much more quickly giving a very tight fit in the mid and lower thigh. (also a tag 34)
I also have a pair of super broken in / stretched out 634-21OD's in a tag 33 with a 35/13/10.5/15.0 dims and the rise on those feels more similar to these 777's but those still sits a bit higher. Definitely a roomier width top block for obvious reasons.
A size up might have worked for me in this collab, but worried they may have looked a little big in the thigh/leg. The size I tried was spot on in everything except with how low it sits for me. Unsure if that helps you at all.
-
Thanks guys. I wii give it a go. 666 is definitely a no go the thigh is slimmer than the 777. Going tag 42 on 666 is not an option when i am tag 36 in the waist. My ideal fit wil be a pair with a 36 inch waist and a 14.4 thigh. Good luck with that. So usually i go tag 38 on 634 and make it to work.
