The (Less intimidating) Watch Thread
-
*Btw, Maddy wants a Rolex as well… So, the only way she would kill me for buying one for myself, is if I didn't get her one also, lol
Her dad has had an 18k gold Day-Date since the late 70's, and she says she can always remember thinking that his watch was so nice. Well, a few years back, he had a stroke... When the ambulance can to fetch him to the hospital, before they left, they told Maddy to take his valuables, including his watch. She said she wore his watch for about 2 weeks while he was hospitalized. Finally when it was time for him to check out, he asked "Where is my watch?!"... She wanted to keep it, and he wouldn't let her. He told her "No you can't have it! Obviously it's going to your brother after I die!!!".
-
I'm going to start posting Langes and Pateks to Maddy's Facebook feed in that case. Something like this, perhaps.
The big difference between a Rolex and a Patek is really down to the level of finishing on the movement.
This is a Rolex movement. It's got an industrial finish to it. Most watches in this price range (Omega, Panerai, Jaeger, etc.) will have a similar look.
In contrast, this is from Patek. A lot of the decoration will be done by hand, along with careful polishing and beveling of the edges of the plates, and it's got a gold rotor. A Lange & Sohne, Vacheron Constantin, and Audemars Piguet all play in this space.
The finishing is more aesthetic than anything else. I doubt that the Patek will be more accurate than a Rolex, nor more reliable. But the hand finishing is what drives the price way up.
-
-
If you really want a Rolex, and Maddy won't leave you for spending that much, then there's probably an argument for saving for one. Ultimately it'll work out cheaper than buying the intermediate Seiko, Tudor, etc.
The danger is that you'll then think, "I really want a Patek Nautilus…"
exactly..
-
Gonna post this for three reasons:
- the "less intimidating" thread is now talking about Pateks. That madness just needs to stop.
- pictures are always good.
- I am completely, self-destructively, pissing away the day at work, so why not?
This is an old eBay purchase- no idea of the specifics, other than its manual wind and reasonably accurate.
-
I love watches and they are a mandatory accessory for me, I feel naked if I leave the house without one. With that being said I am by no means a watch "snob" and my knowledge regarding movements, etc… is nonexistent. So this thread is perfect for me. I'm a sucker for chronograph's, metal bands, and in the 42mm to 48mm range. Two brands I like that fall under the less intimidating category are Tissot and Nixon.
Tissot
Nixon
-
It seems all gold watches aren't as popular these days but I think they look great when worn with the right outfit. Gold/Black is always a good combo.
-
I have an aversion to shiny gold things (or brass). I prefer shiny silver things
-
I have an aversion to shiny gold things (or brass). I prefer shiny silver things
That's a fair point. The Nixon posted above (which I do own) has a brushed/matte type of finish so it's not a shiny/gawdy type of gold so I agree with you. That watch actually draws lots of compliments too….. and I'm with you, I love shiny silver things.
-
I have an aversion to shiny gold things (or brass). I prefer shiny silver things
That's a fair point. The Nixon posted above (which I do own) has a brushed/matte type of finish so it's not a shiny/gawdy type of gold so I agree with you. That watch actually draws lots of compliments too….. and I'm with you, I love shiny silver things.
I can't quite put my finger on why I dislike gold or brass. Could be that they don't look good with my skin tone, which is partly why I can't wear yellow shirts. With belt buckles it technically doesn't matter since they'd be covered by my shirt anyways, but silver or nickel has always been a personal preference. The one exception i'd make for brass is for belt hooks/key fobs or whatever they're called, but I don't carry a back pocket wallet or use a rein so it's irrelevant
-
Oh I get it. I'm generally not a fan of yellow gold either and the only gold accessory I will wear is a gold watch. I think they can work great and stand out against the sea of silver watches worn by most. For some reason I only wear it in the winter and it really pops when worn with certain colors (black, burgundy, navy, white…)
-
I generally have an aversion to all shiny things, and jewelry in general… I don't even have a wedding ring.....
That's partly why I really like the look of the Hamilton Khaki Field line... Very understated, but can be dressed up or down. But, admittedly, my favorite has a polished bezel, whilst the rest of the case is brushed.
-
Gonna post this for three reasons:
- the "less intimidating" thread is now talking about Pateks. That madness just needs to stop.
Fake Texan keeping it real [emoji1]
@UnTucked and @manufc10 last posts contain some great looking watches that are more in my ballpark. While I understand the attraction of the watches Graeme compares, and it was a great post, I’m just not “there” yet. By that I mean that while I appreciate the beauty of the Patek I’m just not ready to spend that much IH money on a watch that I won’t appreciate in the way it deserves.
